Introduction
Conventional oncology largely uses chemotherapy to destroy cancer cells.
There can be no doubt that chemotherapy works, and that in any cancer
case, cancer cells need destroying. Chemotherapy is backed by high quality
clinical trials and has been studied extensively for nearly 40 years.
Practically every known solid tumour has a solid evidence-base and the
Oncologist will be able to give you a pretty accurate percentage success
rate of any particular treatment regime, in any particular solid cancer.
However, clearly, chemotherapy has a downside as it’s a
highly toxic treatment and in many patients is poorly tolerated, and there
are studies in the conventional oncology literature that imply that a
significant number of patients can die of chemotherapy, as opposed to the
cancer. A recent play televised at peak viewing time on BBC2 in December
2002, called ‘WIT’, portrayed a harrowing drama about a woman, an English
Professor, dying of cancer. The heroine was brilliantly acted by Emma
Thompson. The dramatic high point of the drama was when the heroine said
to camera. “it’s not the cancer that’s killing me, it’s the treatment”.
Gawanda (2202) states that “everyone in medicine understands that a great
deal of uncertainty about what to do for people, will always remain in any
illness. Human disease and lives are too complicated for reality to be
otherwise. In his book ‘Complications: A Surgeon’s Notes on an Imperfect
Science’ he goes on to say that cancer is just such a complex illness.
However, what happens if you do not wish to partake of the conventional
treatment option such as chemotherapy ?
Are there alternatives ? -
Yes, there are, but they currently have a poor evidence
base, and are never likely to have the quality of evidence base which
backs chemotherapy.
Providing the cancer sufferer knows what the
evidence is, then they can make treatment choices on an informed consent
basis. In our view it is unethical for patients to be offered any of these
treatments without as good an evidence-base as chemotherapy, other than on
an informed consent basis. High dose intravenous vitamin C is one of these
treatments, and we use it extensively in our clinic. It is one of our most
effective treatments. Clearly because of the poor evidence base we largely
see chemotherapy and radiotherapy failures, but interestingly enough those
patients who deliberately seek us out and wish to try these approaches as
a first line option, tend to be the ‘more well informed’ public, and
amongst these, number some doctors, which is indeed a curious situation.
Vitamin C (ascorbate acid) is a major water soluble anti-oxidant with a
variety of biological functions. It may be important in maintaining proper
immune cell function. Even though vitamin C commonly functions as an
anti-oxidant is can also act as a pro-oxidant, that is actually oxidising
tissues, which is what chemotherapy does. Vitamin C converts free radicals
into hydrogen peroxide, a molecule that can damage cell membranes if not
neutralised by an enzyme inside the cell called Catalase.
Tumour cells have 10-100 times less Catalase than normal
cells, and are therefore more sensitive than normal to hydrogen peroxide.
Vitamin C accumulates in solid tumours at concentrations higher than those
in surrounding normal tissue. The accumulation of vitamin C preferentially
in cancer tissues, has raised concerns that vitamin C may provide tumours
with anti-oxidant protection from chemotherapeutic agents. In practice
therefore, the avoidance of vitamin C and indeed all anti-oxidants, when
going through a chemotherapy programme, is important.
To obtain vitamin C levels at pro-oxidant levels, at which level it
destroys cancer cells, is only achievable by intravenous infusion. Plasma
levels of vitamin C between 300-400 milligrams per 100 mls are what is
required in order to kill significant numbers of cancer cells. This
requires intravenous infusions of 75 grams of vitamin C, (in some cases
less, depending on the size of the patient and the tumour cell mass),
infused intravenously on a daily basis for three weeks in order to be able
to attain these plasma levels.
It’s important to realise that the highest plasma level
of vitamin C achievable in humans using oral supplementation is 4.5
milligrams per 100 mls, Riordan et al 1995 Many studies have been done on
this approach in the laboratory and Phase 1 and Phase II clinical trials
have been completed on this approach. (Phase II clinical trials have been
carried out in Nebraska, USA and are about to be published). Phase III
clinical studies are in discussion.
Our most common protocol is the use of 75 grams of vitamin C, in sterile
water, with a number of minerals, particularly Magnesium, Zinc, Chromium,
Selenium, B12 and some B vitamins. The patient is infused over 2½ hours
daily for 3 weeks (excluding weekends). The vitamin C levels at the end of
the infusion course is tested and if this is sufficiently high then some
significant tumour kill has happened. If it isn’t, then this regime may
have to be repeated.
The advantage of using this approach is that it doesn’t
carry the downsides of chemotherapy, and can be repeated many times. The
main downside is that if we are working with patients who have fluid
accumulation in the chest, say from a lung cancer, or fluid accumulation
in the abdomen say from ovarian cancer, then the fluid load that these
intravenous infusions involve can make these situations worse. So in those
patients we choose other safe options to kill cancer cells.
Concurrently with the high dose intravenous vitamin C, we use supplements,
the most important of which is Lipoic acid. Lipoic acid has been found to
enhance the cancer killing effect of vitamin C, and the mechanism for this
is unknown.
The only side effect we see in this treatment is tiredness due to tumour
cell death, as well as increased fluid accumulation in particular groups
of patients, as mentioned above.
Conclusion
Even though chemotherapy has such a high quality evidence-base, it doesn’t
mean that other less well researched treatments do not also work.
References:
1. Gawande A (2002). Complications – A Surgeon’s Notes On An Imperfect
Science. Profile Books, London
2. Riordan N H et al (1995). Intravenous Ascorbate as a Tumour Cytotoxic
Chemotherapeutic Agents. Medical Hypothesis 44.207-213. Pearson
Professional Limited.
AUTHOR’S RELEVANT INFORMATION – As requested
1. Mrs
2. Kimber Joanna
3. Nurse Manager
4. Diploma in Nursing Sciences
5. Dove Clinic for Integrated Medicine
6. Northfields Farm, Hazeley Road, Twyford, Nr Winchester
7. SO21 1QA
8. England
9. 97 37 99 F
10. 01962 717803
11. -
12. 01962 717804
13. nursing@doveclinic.com
14. N/A
15. Are there safer ways of killing cancer cells than chemotherapy ?
16. That chemotherapy/radiotherapy is not the only line of treatment
available.
17. To obtain vitamin C levels at pro-oxidant levels, at which level it
destroys cancer cells, is only achievable by intravenous infusion. Plasma
levels of vitamin C between 300-400 milligrams per 100 mls are what is
required in order to kill significant numbers of cancer cells. This
requires intravenous infusions of 75 grams of vitamin C, (in some cases
less, depending on the size of the patient and the tumour cell mass),
infused intravenously on a daily basis for three weeks in order to be able
to attain these plasma levels. It’s important to realise that the highest
plasma level of vitamin C achievable in humans using oral supplementation
is 4.5 milligrams per 100 mls, Riordan et al 1995 Many studies have been
done on this approach in the laboratory and Phase 1 and Phase II clinical
trials have been completed on this approach. (Phase II clinical trials
have been carried out in Nebraska, USA and are about to be published).
Phase III clinical studies are in discussion.
18. All done through British Society of Integrated Medicine.
19. Thomas Levy et al (2002) Xlibris Corporation 1-888-795-4274:
iSBN1-4010-6964-9
20. Presentation
21. Dipoma in Nursing Sciences, Community Staff Nurse, Practice Nurse,
Clinic Nurse.
22. Integrated Medicine
23. Yes
Stem Cell Research Breakthrough |
|